How the North Korean Lazarus Group Hacked Crypto Exchange Bybit for $1.5 Billion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78779/7877933d6d9a9c960970eb84fc0cefdffdb8cb6e" alt="How the North Korean Lazarus Group Hacked Crypto Exchange Bybit for $1.5 Billion"
In a stunning revelation, cybersecurity experts have unraveled the mystery behind the largest cryptocurrency hack in history, nearly a staggering $1.5 billion theft from the Bybit exchange.
The culprits? North Korean hackers who exploited a trusted wallet provider called Safe, in a meticulously crafted attack. This breach, confirmed by independent audits from leading firms Verichains and Sygnia Labs, exposes the vulnerabilities lurking in even the most reputed corners of the digital asset ecosystem.
The attack, which unfolded last week, didn’t target Bybit’s own systems directly. Instead, the hackers zeroed in on Safe, a crypto wallet provider long regarded as a fortress of security. Analysts found that malicious JavaScript code had been covertly inserted into Safe’s online infrastructure, hosted on Amazon Web Services. While the exact method of infiltration remains unclear, the code was designed with precision. It lay dormant until triggered by Bybit’s specific contract address, activating two days after the initial interaction. Once live, it siphoned off nearly $1.5 billion in Ethereum in a matter of moments. Just two minutes later, the hackers erased their digital fingerprints by updating Safe’s infrastructure, leaving no trace of the malicious code.
Bybit, for its part, has been quick to assure users of its own security. The company acted swiftly, relocating the majority of its funds from Safe-administered wallets in the hours following the attack. While Bybit declined to confirm whether it will cut ties with Safe permanently, its stance is clear: the exchange views itself as a victim, not the weak link.
Stay In The Loop and Never Miss Important News
Sign up and be the first to know when we publishSafe’s Response and Industry Fallout
Safe, meanwhile, has found itself in the hot seat. In a statement, the wallet provider acknowledged that the breach originated from a compromised developer machine. However, it pushed back against broader criticism, asserting that its smart contracts and front-end source code showed no inherent flaws. Safe claims to have overhauled its infrastructure and updated all credentials, insisting that the vulnerability has been fully addressed.
As the dust settles, the Bybit hack raises pressing questions about trust and resilience in the crypto space. While Safe scrambles to restore confidence and Bybit doubles down on its security claims, the industry faces a reckoning. For users and developers, the lesson is stark: even the most fortified systems are only as strong as their weakest link.